It maps 8 things that hold a Dogme lesson together when there's no script to hide behind. Things like tasks that spark real talk, feedback that supports learning without killing the momentum and how to handle emergent language without derailing the whole conversation.
But the section I keep coming back to is number 6: questions that keep conversation alive. Specifically this:
Ask genuine, personal questions.
Use evaluative questions that invite thinking.
Let go of display and comprehension questions that stop interaction dead.
That last one alone is worth printing out and sticking somewhere you'll see it before class.
The image gives you the map. The Linkedin post is where teachers got honest about what it actually looks like in their classrooms. (come and read the comments, I think you'll find something that resonates)
And look, I know what some of you might be thinking. No plan, no coursebook, no fixed script... are we just showing up and hoping for the best?I understand why that question comes up. From the outside, it can look chaotic. But here's the thing:
Dogme doesn't reject preparation. It reframes it.
You prepare by knowing your learners well enough to respond to what matters in the moment. You prepare by sharpening your ear, not just for grammar slips, but for what's trying to be expressed underneath the words. It took me years to get comfortable with that. I was trained, like many of us, to treat a lesson plan as a map.
But Dogme is less about maps and more about orientation. You know roughly where you're going and you stay open to unexpected turns because sometimes that's where the best learning happens (I went deeper on all of this in a post that got some really honest comments. Read it here on Linkedinho )
So no, we're not winging it. We're working with what's already there and trying to make the most of it.
Have a beautiful week,
 Cecilia
|